Jacques v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Marc Jacques |
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden USP Lewisburg |
1:2019cv01454 |
August 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
PT |
Sylvia H Rambo |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the superintendent or warden of the institution at which Petitioner is currently incarcerated is directed to provide certified copies of the statement of Petitioner's trust fund account to this Court and to the Petitioner. The statement should reflect all activity in that account for the six-month period immediately preceding the lodging of the complaint in this action. Signed by LP on 08/21/2019. Copies of this Order have been sent to the Warden/Superintendent and to the petitioner. (lp) |
Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marc Jacques.(lp) |
Filing 2 SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Marc Jacques. (lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Marc Jacques.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.