Ramos Gomez v. Barr et al
| Alex Ramos Gomez |
| Matthew Albence, Timothy Robbins, Craig A. Lowe, Kevin McAleenan, William Barr and Simona Flores-Lund |
| 1:2019cv01818 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Matthew Albence, William Barr, Simona Flores-Lund, Craig A. Lowe, Kevin McAleenan, Timothy Robbins by Matthew Albence, William Barr, Simona Flores-Lund, Craig A. Lowe, Kevin McAleenan, Timothy Robbins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Sanderson, Joanne) |
| Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of PWHC and OSC RECEIVED from USAO. (kjn) |
Filing 2
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Respondents shall show cause on or before December 16, 2019 why the petitioner should not be granted habeas corpus relief. 2. Petitioner shall, if he so desires, file a reply to the response no later than December 30, 2019. 3. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this Order on the United States Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 25, 2019. (kjn)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 0314-4903662), filed by Alex Ramos Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s))(mfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
