Shauf v. Marsh
| Jason C. Shauf |
| Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Richard Marsh and Franklin County District Attorney |
| 1:2019cv01911 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| CA |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Letter from the Attorney General of PA referring the case to the District Attorney. (bg) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting respondents' motion #10 for enlargement of time to file answer to petition for writ of habeas corpus & memo of law until 2/7/20 & permitting ptnr to file reply to answer w/in 14 days of date answer filed. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/10/19. (ki)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura J. Kerstetter on behalf of Franklin County District Attorney (Kerstetter, Laura) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Franklin County District Attorney by Franklin County District Attorney. (Kerstetter, Laura) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to refile document 9 using the events: Civil Events, Other Filings, Notices, Attorney Appearance - Entry of Appearance. (rw) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Document 9 deleted and refiled as document #11 . (rw) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER directing Clrk of Ct to serve copy of petition #1 for writ of h/c & this order on respondents & DA for Franklin County; directing respondents to w/in 21 days of date of this order answer allegations in petition w/ memo of law; permitting ptnr to file reply to answer w/in 14 days of date answer filed; & noting ct will decide whether to hold hearing on basis of petition, answer &, if filed, reply. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/25/19. (ki)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Jason C. Shauf. (aaa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: petition for writ of h/c #1 - Ptnr GRANTED leave to elect w/in 4 days of date of this order to w/draw petition or have it construed & ruled upon under 28 USC 2254, directing ptnr to FILE w/in 45 days of date of this order attached election form indicating election to w/draw petition or have it construed & ruled upon under 28 USC 2254, & noting failure to comply w/ this order will result in petition being construed & ruled upon under 28 USC 2254. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/12/19. (ki)
|
| Receipt of payment from JASON C SHAUF in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 11/7/2019. Receipt number 333068503 processed by epetrosk. (jjs) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333068503. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ep) |
| Filing 4 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 11/05/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in support of Habeas Corpus Relief filed by Jason C. Shauf. (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Jason C. Shauf.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
