Boyd v. Barr et al
| Daniel Eliezer Boyd |
| John Doe, William P. Barr and Catricia Howard |
| 1:2019cv01932 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EBC |
| John E Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Relief from Judgment #4 Order Dismissing Case, MOTION to Alter Judgment, MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Order Dismissing Case, filed by Daniel Eliezer Boyd.(pjr) |
Filing 4
ORDER 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 isDISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.2. The dismissal is without prejudice to Petitioners right to seek relief inthe sentencing court.3. The Clerk of Court is directed to NOTIFY the Petitioner and CLOSEthis case. (eo)
|
| Receipt of payment from DANIEL BOYD in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 11/12/2019. Receipt number 111024628 processed by aarlidge. (jjs) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 11102468. (pjr) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (pjr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Daniel Eliezer Boyd.(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
