Pepe v. Modis Inc.
| Thomas A. Pepe |
| Modis Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02031 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| John E Jones |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaitly C Vik on behalf of Modis Inc. (Vik, Jaitly) |
| Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Joint) by Thomas A. Pepe. (Nahass, Zachary) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Renee E. Franchi on behalf of Thomas A. Pepe (Franchi, Renee) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Thomas A. Pepe. Modis Inc. waiver sent on 11/26/2019, answer due 1/27/2020. (Nahass, Zachary) |
| Filing 7 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORMS APPROVED as to Jacqueline R. Barrett and Vik Jaitly (eo) |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Jessica M Bocchinfuso on behalf of Modis Inc. Attorney Vik Jaitly is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0314-4958580.. (Bocchinfuso, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Jessica M Bocchinfuso on behalf of Modis Inc. Attorney Jacqueline R. Barrett is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0314-4958576.. (Bocchinfuso, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica M Bocchinfuso on behalf of Modis Inc.. (Bocchinfuso, Jessica) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Petitioner and associate counsel bar status verified as to documents #5 & #6 . (rw) |
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 1/29/2020 11:45 AM before Honorable John E. Jones III. Counsel must utilize the dates in the attached court's calendar when selecting a trial month(eo)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Modis Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (rw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Modis Inc. ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-4939766), filed by Thomas A. Pepe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pepe v. Modis Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Modis Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jaitly C Vik |
| Represented By: | Jessica M Bocchinfuso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas A. Pepe | |
| Represented By: | Zachary E Nahass |
| Represented By: | Renee E. Franchi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
