Sutton v. Noel et al
Plaintiff: Kelvin Sutton
Defendant: Dr. Paul Noel, Dr. Haresh Pandya and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Case Number: 1:2019cv02080
Filed: December 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CA
Referring Judge: Christopher C Conner
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2020 Filing 11 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dr. Paul Noel. (Mazeski, Vincent)
January 15, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent R Mazeski on behalf of Dr. Paul Noel. (Mazeski, Vincent)
January 15, 2020 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Dr. Paul Noel. Dr. Paul Noel waiver sent on 12/18/2019, answer due 2/18/2020. (Mazeski, Vincent)
December 18, 2019 Filing 8 Waiver of Service forms (AO 398 and 399) Mailed to Dr. Paul Noel, Dr. Haresh Pandya Waiver of Service due by 1/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Labels)(mfa)
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND AO 398 AND 399 WAIVERS FORMS to defendants. ; granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperisSigned by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/18/2019. (mfa)
December 17, 2019 Filing 6 Certified Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kelvin Sutton. (kpf) Modified on 12/17/2019 (lp).
December 17, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kelvin Sutton.(kpf)
December 6, 2019 Filing 4 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 12/06/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp)
December 6, 2019 Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 02/08/2011. (Attachments: #1 0285)(lp)
December 6, 2019 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
December 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Kelvin Sutton.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. Noel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Paul Noel
Represented By: Vincent R Mazeski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Haresh Pandya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelvin Sutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?