Corbett v. Clark et al
| Burl Neil Corbett |
| Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Michael Clark |
| 1:2020cv00313 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| CA |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER - The petition #1 for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The motion #4 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED for the sole purpose of the filing of this action. Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 4/16/2020. (ktt)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Burl Neil Corbett. (ao) |
| Filing 4 MOTION (Application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, including certification, by Burl Neil Corbett.(ao) Modified on 3/3/2020 (lp). Modified on 3/3/2020 (lp). |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Burl Neil Corbett.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
