Feidler v. Hoover et al
Petitioner: Robert Feidler
Respondent: Angela Hoover and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Case Number: 1:2020cv00418
Filed: March 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EB
Referring Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2020 Filing 10 Mail Returned (Doc. #6) as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Robert Feidler (ao)
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum #8 :1. Petrs mtn for IFP #4 is GRANTED; 2. Petrs petn for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE; and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 4/7/20. (ma)
April 7, 2020 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 and mtn for IFP #4 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 4/7/20. (ma)
April 7, 2020 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (lg)
March 31, 2020 Filing 6 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the superintendent or warden of the institution at which petitioner is currently incarcerated is directed to provide certified copies of the statement of petitioner's trust fund account to this Court and to the Petitioner. The statement should reflect all activity in that account for the six-month period immediately preceding the lodging of the petition in this action.Signed by LP on 03/31/2020. (lp)
March 30, 2020 Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Robert Feidler. (ao)
March 30, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION (Application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Feidler.(ao)
March 11, 2020 Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 03/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp)
March 11, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
March 11, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Robert Feidler.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feidler v. Hoover et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Angela Hoover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Feidler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?