Rivera v. Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.
| Freddy Rivera |
| Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00438 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have until May 25, 2020 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 4/20/2020 (ve)
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chwastyk, Devin) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel R. Hadrick on behalf of Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.. (Hadrick, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Devin J. Chwastyk on behalf of Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.. (Chwastyk, Devin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Robert Long on behalf of Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.. (Long, Adam) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew L. Levy on behalf of Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.. (Levy, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Freddy Rivera. Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc. served on 4/2/2020, answer due 4/23/2020. (Lichten, Harold) |
| Filing 9 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Harold Lichten, Esquire.Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/26/2020. (ve) |
| Filing 8 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Matthew Thomson, Esquire.Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/26/2020. (ve) |
| Filing 7 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Zachary Rubin, Esquire.Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/26/2020. (ve) |
| Filing 6 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Mark J. Gottesfeld on behalf of Freddy Rivera Attorney Zachary Rubin is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0314-5046234.. (Gottesfeld, Mark) |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Mark J. Gottesfeld on behalf of Freddy Rivera Attorney Matthew Thomson is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0314-5046214.. (Gottesfeld, Mark) |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Mark J. Gottesfeld on behalf of Freddy Rivera Attorney Harold L. Lichten is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0314-5046190.. (Gottesfeld, Mark) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Petitioners, Zachary Rubin, Matthew Thomson, Harold Lichten, and Associate Counsel bar status verified. (pjr) |
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 3/18/2020. (ve) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (mfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc. ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-5036846), filed by Freddy Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
