Smith et al v. Harrison et al
| Ryan Smith and Christine Smith |
| Southwestern Regional Police Department, Southwestern Regional Police Board, Stuart Harrison and Spring Grove Borough |
| 1:2020cv00770 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| John E Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Stuart Harrison, Southwestern Regional Police Board, Southwestern Regional Police Department, Spring Grove Borough and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (rw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stuart Harrison, Southwestern Regional Police Board, Southwestern Regional Police Department, Spring Grove Borough ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 0314-5089025), filed by Ryan Smith, Christine Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
