Kenyon v. Saul
| Nathaniel Kenyon |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv01372 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Summons Returned Executed on 8/20/2020 as to the Attorney General. (bg) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew Saul. Andrew Saul served on 8/20/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (bg) |
| Filing 10 CONSENTS to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge Carlson in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 19-5. (jkc) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Nathaniel Kenyon, SSA, Andrew Saul YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 9/25/2020. (kjn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa Swauger on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Swauger, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 USM 285 Form of Service for Summons and Complaint served on U.S. Atty Scranton on 8/18/20. (ep) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Service Form, #2 USM 285 Service Form) (ma) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting pltf's mtn to proceed ifp #2 and DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT. All parties shall comply with the Standing Practice Order entered by the court.Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 8/5/20. (ma)
|
| Filing 4 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security AppealsSigned by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 8/5/20. (ma) |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Peter A. Gorton on behalf of Nathaniel Kenyon Attorney Peter Gorton is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50 Receipt Number: APAMDC-5192457. (Attachments: #1 Code of Conduct, #2 Affidavit)(mfa) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathaniel Kenyon.(mfa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Nathaniel Kenyon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(mfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kenyon v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Swauger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathaniel Kenyon | |
| Represented By: | Peter A. Gorton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
