Murphy v. Mace-Leibson et al
| James E. Murphy |
| Unknown Regional Medical Director, Unknown Medical Director, Dr. Mace-Leibson and M. Swoboski |
| 1:2020cv01390 |
| August 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EBC |
| John E Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE 1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to either paythe filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis asdirected in the Courts Administrative Order (Doc. 3).2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (eo)
|
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 08/06/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (FTCA))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Federal & Local Rules, #4 398 Form, #5 399 Form) (lp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unknown Medical Director, Dr. Mace-Leibson, Unknown Regional Medical Director, M. Swoboski lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by James E. Murphy.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
