Neaves et al v. Harley et al
Russell Neaves and Anthony Asmar Gustitus |
Jeannie Schembri and Mrs. Harley |
1:2020cv01553 |
August 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
DB |
Matthew W Brann |
Sylvia H Rambo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner (Gustitus) to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(lg) (Main Document 5 replaced on 9/17/2020) (lg). |
Filing 4 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner (Neaves) to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(lg) (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/17/2020) (lg). |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Instructions, #2 Prisoner Excerpts, #3 398 Form, #4 399 Form) (lg) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/31/2020) (lg). (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/17/2020) (lg). |
Filing 2 MOTION/application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Asmar Gustitus, Russell Neaves.(lg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Russell Neaves, pro se and Anthony Asmar Gustitus, pro se.(lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.