Hill-Gamble v. PA Attorney General et al
Petitioner: Calvin Hill-Gamble
Respondent: Mark Garman and PA Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2020cv01592
Filed: September 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Susan E Schwab
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2020 Filing 7 REPLY by Mark Garman, PA Attorney General. to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Motion to Stay. (Lysaght, Ryan)
October 27, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to refile Doc. 7 using the event: Civil Events Motions and Related Filings Responses and Replies (Briefs)- Brief in Opposition (Do not use for Summary Judgment Motions). (pjr)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - We will rule on the petition as a 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition; directing that the Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition, the motion to stay, and this order on the District Attorney of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania and the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; the respondent shall file, on or before October 29, 2020, a response to Hill-Gambles motion to stay. The respondent need not file a response to the merits of the petition until ordered by the Court to do so after the motion to stay is decided. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 10/13/20. (ki)
September 24, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Stay filed by Calvin Hill-Gamble.(pjr)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re: petition #1 for writ of habeas corpus - By 10/9/20 the petitioner shall complete & file the enclosed election form, indicating an election to have the petition construed & ruled upon under 28 U.S.C. 2254 or to withdraw the current petition - if the petitioner fails to complete & file the election form, the petition will be ruled upon under 28 U.S.C. 2254. (See order for complete details.0Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 9/9/20. (ki)
September 5, 2020 Receipt of payment from CALVIN HILL GAMBLE in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 9/3/2020. Receipt number 111025957 processed by aarlidge. (jjs)
September 4, 2020 Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 111025957 (mw)
September 3, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED. (mw)
September 3, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Calvin Hill-Gamble.(mw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill-Gamble v. PA Attorney General et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Garman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PA Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Calvin Hill-Gamble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?