Haynes v. Starbucks Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Laurica Haynes
Defendant: Starbucks Corp. doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company and Manpower US, INC.
Case Number: 1:2020cv01865
Filed: October 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Christopher C Conner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2020 Filing 8 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Jacqueline Barrett Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/24/2020. (mw)
November 24, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Petitioning attorney and associate counsel's bar status verified. (aaa)
November 23, 2020 Filing 7 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Jaitly C Vik on behalf of Starbucks Corp. Attorney Jacqueline Barrett is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-5357635.. (Vik, Jaitly)
November 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jaitly C Vik on behalf of Starbucks Corp. (Vik, Jaitly)
November 23, 2020 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Laurica Haynes. Starbucks Corp. waiver sent on 10/9/2020, answer due 12/8/2020. (Mahan, Steve)
October 27, 2020 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Laurica Haynes. Manpower US, INC. waiver sent on 10/9/2020, answer due 12/8/2020. (Mahan, Steve)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re: case assignment and initial procedures. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 10/09/2020. (spm)
October 9, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa)
October 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number APAMDC-5291254), filed by Laurica Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. Starbucks Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corp. doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Represented By: Jaitly C Vik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Manpower US, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurica Haynes
Represented By: Derrek William Cummings
Represented By: Steve Todd Mahan, Jr.
Represented By: Larry A. Weisberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?