Colyer v. Wetzel et al
Nicholas Theodore Colyer |
John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and PA State Attorney General |
1:2020cv02130 |
November 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
PT |
Jennifer P Wilson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED THAT:1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/7/2021. (ve) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Nicholas Theodore Colyer. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/7/2021. (ve) |
Receipt of payment from NICHOLAS THEODORE COLYER in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 11/16/2020. Receipt number 333073811 processed by smurphy. (jjs) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333073811. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ao) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (mw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus,filing fee received, filed by Nicholas Theodore Colyer.(mw) Modified on 11/16/2020 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.