Cox v. Thompson
| Sirewl R. Cox |
| R. Thompson |
| 1:2020cv02402 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| PT |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Respondent's Motion filed for extension of time #6 by Sirewl R. Cox. (dw) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by R. Thompson by R. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex. 1 Inman Decl., & Attachments A-C, #2 Unpublished Opinion(s) Kuriti v. White)(Swauger, Melissa) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Extend Time. Respondent shall file a response on or before February 9, 2021. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/26/2021 (ve)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to to Respond to Habes Petition until February 9, 2021 by R. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Swauger, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed by USA. (pjr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of the petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, and to note the address of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Attorney on the front of the docket sheet in this case. All documents filed by the parties, and by the court, shall be served upon the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. See Rule 5; 28 U.S.C. 2254; 2. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall answer, motion, or other response to the allegations of the petition. See order for further details. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/5/2021. (ve)
|
| Receipt of payment from SIREWL R COX in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 12/23/2020. Receipt number 111026468 processed by bdanilow. (tp) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 12/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Sirewl R. Cox.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Thompson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Sirewl R. Cox | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: R. Thompson | |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
| Represented By: | Melissa Swauger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
