Jin et al v. Lantzch
| Victor H. Sparrow, III and Ying Jin |
| Emily T. Lantzch |
| 1:2021cv00204 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| William I Arbuckle |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 Supplemental MOTION judicial notice by Victor H. Sparrow, III.(Sparrow, Victor) |
| Filing 27 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #16 MOTION to Stay filed by Victor H. Sparrow, III.(Sparrow, Victor) |
Filing 26
ORDER regarding E-filing and registration for a pro se unrepresented party. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 3/25/2021. (caw)
|
|
Filing 25
SCHEDULING ORDER: Oral Argument set for 4/5/2021 beginning at 10:00 AM via Zoom before Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle. Plaintiffs Ying Jin and Victor H. Sparrow, III and counsel for Defendant Emily T. Lantzch are required to participate in the Oral Argument on 4/5/2021. Defendant, Emily T. Lantzch is invited to attend the Oral Argument but is not required. In light of the Oral Argument, the deadline for Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 22) is extended by seven (7) days and will now be due on or before 4/13/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 3/25/2021. (caw)
|
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS by Victor H. Sparrow, III. (aaa) |
| Filing 23 REQUEST for telephonic status conference by Victor H. Sparrow, III. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(aaa) |
| Filing 22 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Victor H. Sparrow, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(aaa) |
| Filing 21 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #16 MOTION to Stay filed by Ying Jin, Victor H. Sparrow, III.(aaa) |
| Filing 20 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Ying Jin, Victor H. Sparrow, III. (aaa) |
| Filing 19 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #16 MOTION to Stay filed by Emily T. Lantzch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit D, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit F)(Sulcove, Elliott) |
| Filing 18 Letter to Court from Plaintiff re case. (aaa) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER re #16 MOTION to Stay filed by Emily T. Lantzch - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant Emily T. Lantzch will file a Brief in Support of her Motion for Stay (Doc. 16) on or before 3/22/2021. See Local Rule 7.5. Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay will be due within fourteen (14) days of receiving service of Defendants Brief in Support. See Local Rule 7.6. All briefs shall conform to the content and length requirements of Local Rule 7.8. All other briefing deadlines are STAYED pending resolution of the Motion to Stay (Doc. 16). PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 3/11/2021. (caw)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Stay by Emily T. Lantzch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C)(Sulcove, Elliott) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE by Emily T. Lantzch to #12 Amended Document Request for Judicial Notice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Memo Memorandum of Law In Support of Response)(Sulcove, Elliott) |
| Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Emily T. Lantzch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B)(Sulcove, Elliott) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Mediator filed by Victor H. Sparrow, III. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s))(aaa) |
| Filing 11 Letter to Court from Victor Sparrow III requesting subpoenas. (aaa) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to All Parties YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 3/22/2021. (caw) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Elliott B. Sulcove on behalf of Emily T. Lantzch (Sulcove, Elliott) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED Request for Mandatory Judicial Notice filed by Victor H. Sparrow, III. (aaa) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for Judicial Notice by Victor H. Sparrow, III. (aaa) |
| Receipt of payment from YING JIN in the amount of $402.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE- NON-PRISONER. Transaction posted on 2/11/2021. Receipt number 111026676 processed by bdanilow. (jjs) |
| Filing 7 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED. (lg) |
| Filing 6 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER (Attachment: #1 Order) (lg) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Emily T. Lantzch and provided TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS (a) by Ying Jin, Victor H. Sparrow, III. (Attachments: #1 b, #2 c, #3 d, #4 part two, #5 e, #6 f)(aaa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by Ying Jin, Victor H. Sparrow, III. (aaa) |
| Filing 2 Letter to Court from Victor Sparrow III re filing. (aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Emily T. Lantzch, filed by Ying Jin, Victor H. Sparrow, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
