Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
John Doe |
1:2021cv00352 |
February 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
John E Jones |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. (eo) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Saruya, Jason) |
Filing 7 ORDER Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena Prior to aRule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 6) is GRANTED subject to the conditions contained in the order. See order for details. (eo) |
Filing 6 MOTION Ex Parte Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to the Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memo, #2 Appendix, #3 Declaration Patrick Paige, #4 Declaration Susan Stalzer, #5 Declaration David Williamson, #6 Proposed Order)(Saruya, Jason) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to file the brief in support of Doc. 6 as a separate entry using the event: Civil Events Motions and Related Filings Responses and Replies (Briefs)- Brief in Support (Do not use for Summary Judgment Motions). (pjr) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 4/30/2021 11:15 AM before Chief Judge John E. Jones III. Counsel MUST agree to a trial term and incorporate the dates that correspond with the term selected in the JCMP (see attached court calendar). See order for call instructions.(eo) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Saruya, Jason) |
Filing 3 Report to Register of Copyrights. (pjr) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John Doe and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (pjr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5490951), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Doe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jason M. Saruya |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.