Highlands v. Saul
| Dennis Eugene Highlands |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2021cv00659 |
| April 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert D Mariani |
| Susan E Schwab |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Robert D. Mariani and referred to Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab as one or more parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jkc) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Dennis Eugene Highlands, Andrew M. Saul YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 6/2/2021 (ki) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S. Judge on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. (Judge, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dennis Eugene Highlands. Andrew M. Saul served on 4/23/2021, answer due 6/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice, #2 Summons Executed on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region III, SSA)(Chermol, David) |
Filing 3
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 04/12/21. (pjr)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 and 399 Waiver Forms, #2 Summons Packet) (pjr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5541399), filed by Dennis Eugene Highlands. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Highlands v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dennis Eugene Highlands | |
| Represented By: | David F Chermol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | Timothy S. Judge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
