Kiger v. Saul
| Mercedes Lee Kiger |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 1:2021cv00752 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Yvette Kane |
| Susan E Schwab |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mercedes Lee Kiger. Andrew M. Saul served on 5/18/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on Attorney General of USA, Department of Justice, #2 Summons Executed on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region III, SSA)(Chermol, David) |
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Yvette Kane and referred to Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab as one or more parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jkc) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Mercedes Lee Kiger, Andrew M. Saul YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 6/7/2021 (ki) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by George Michael Thiel on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. (Thiel, George) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Mercedes Lee Kiger. (Chermol, David) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (pjr) |
Filing 2
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 04/26/21. (pjr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5557023), filed by Mercedes Lee Kiger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kiger v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mercedes Lee Kiger | |
| Represented By: | David F Chermol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
