Rodriguez v. Finley et al
| Hector Rodriguez |
| FNU, LNU Chaplain, Associate Warden Berkishier, Chang and Scott Finley |
| 1:2021cv00783 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EBC |
| John E Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 4. Mail sent to Hector Rodriguez. Envelope marked: RTS-Unable to forward. Search of BOP website indicates he is being housed at FCI Allenwood Medium. Mail sent. (aaa) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE- See order for details. (eo)
|
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 04/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms) (lp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT/Motion for TRO/PI against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Hector Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
