Gladden v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Ronald Robert Gladden |
U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and Warden Clair Doll |
1:2021cv00802 |
May 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
EB |
Yvette Kane |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry #13 ) - AND NOW, on this 23rd day of June 2021, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED; 2. Petitioners motion to compel (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/23/21. (dmn) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry #14 ) re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. See Memorandum for further details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/23/21. (dmn) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Department of Homeland Security, Clair Doll, U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement by Department of Homeland Security, Clair Doll, U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Sanderson, Joanne) |
Receipt of payment from RONALD GLADDEN in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 5/18/2021. Receipt number 333076389 processed by aoswald. (jjs) |
Filing 11 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333076369. Petition is now deemed FILED. (dw) |
Filing 10 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition, Motion to Compel and Brief Served on U.S. Attorney's Office 5/18/21. (dmn) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - AND NOW, on this 17th day of May 2021, upon consideration of pro se Petitioner Ronald Robert Gladden (Petitioner)s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. No. 1), motion to compel evidence (Doc. No. 4) and brief in support thereof (Doc. No. 5) and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 6), IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED, and his 2241 petition (Doc. No. 1) is DEEMED FILED; SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 5/17/21. (dmn) |
Filing 8 Federal Rule 33/34 Documents Hospital Discovery Records by Ronald Robert Gladden.. (dw) |
Filing 7 Letter from Ronald Robert Gladden re: filing fee, etc. (dw) |
Filing 6 UNCERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Robert Gladden.(dw) |
Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION to Compel Evidence filed by Ronald Robert Gladden.(dw) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Evidence by Ronald Robert Gladden.(dw) |
Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 05/03/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Ronald Robert Gladden.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.