Eckard v. Silcox et al
Bradley A. Eckard |
Katherine H. Silcox, Jessica E. Brewbaker, Nichole Vito and John E. Wetzel |
1:2021cv01382 |
August 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Civil Rights: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. 30 Day Admin order sent to Bradley A. Eckard returned as no inmate number was provided. (Docket updated to reflect this information and remailed 8/17/2021) (nr) |
Filing 4 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the PRO SE Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 8/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Application for IFP (NON-PRISONER SHORT FORM))(caw) |
Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 08/09/21. (pjr) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules) (pjr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/9/2021: #2 Instructions for AO 398 and AO 399 Forms) (pjr). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Bradley A. Eckard.(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.