Hardin v. Thompson
| Arnaz Hardin |
| R. Thompson |
| 1:2021cv01933 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EB |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 - Respondent's response shall be filed on or before February 2, 2022. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 1/10/22. (dmn)
|
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by R. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thiel, George) |
| Filing 13 Letter dtd 12/17/21 from Arnaz Hardin addressed to Respdt R. Thompson RE: request for earned FSA credits. (ao) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #11 - AND SO, on this 16th day of December 2021, upon consideration of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED THAT Petitioners motion to appoint counsel (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/16/21. (dmn)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Arnaz Hardin.(ao) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Extend Time (eo)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by R. Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thiel, George) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for Copy of Petition for H/C by Arnaz Hardin. (dw) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT #2 by Arnaz Hardin. (ao) |
| Filing 6 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition (doc 1) Served on Susan Melendez on 11/22/21 (eo) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1. Petitioners 2241 petition (Doc. No. 1) is DEEMED FILED;2. The Court exercises its discretion under Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. 2254, to apply those rules to this 2241 petition;3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition (Doc. No. 1) and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney and to note the address of the United States Attorney on the front of the docket sheet in this case. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the United States Attorney. See Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. 2254;4. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the allegations of the petition. See Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. 2254;5. Petitioner shall, if he so desires, file a reply to Respondents answer or other pleading within fourteen (14) days after its filing. See Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. foll. 2254; and6. A determination as to whether Petitioner shall be produced for a hearing will be held in abeyance pending the filing of Respondents answer or other pleading.(eo)
|
| Receipt of payment from ARNAZ HARDIN in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 11/19/2021. Receipt number 333078835 processed by aoswald. (jjs) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333078835. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ao) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 11/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Arnaz Hardin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Arnaz Hardin in Support of Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibit 1-Individualized Needs Plan-Program Review dated 11/09/2021 and Summary Reentry Plan-Progress Report dated 09/24/2020 and Inmate Request to Staff Member dated 03/25/2021, #3 Exhibit 2-Copies of Official FBOP Evidence Based Recidivism Reduction Programs and Productive Activities Publication, Inmate Education Data Transcript, Emails and Progress Report which reflects Petitioner's Programming participation, #4 Exhibit 3-Case Manager Walker's Risk and Needs Assessment, Sentence Monitoring Computation Data and Male Classification Form, #5 Exhibit 4-Case Manager Walker's Second Chance Act, Reentry Center Placement, Community Based Program Agreement and Individual Needs Plan-Program Review, #6 Exhibit 5-Declaration of Arnaz Hardin, #7 Exhibit 6-Exhausted Remedies, #8 Exhibit 7-WSJ Article "New York Trump Ex-Lawyer Cohen to be Released")(lp) Modified on 11/16/2021 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hardin v. Thompson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Arnaz Hardin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: R. Thompson | |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
