Cross v. United States of America
| Alito Tijwan Cross and Pamela Cross |
| USP-Allenwood Penitentiary and United States of America |
| 1:2022cv00098 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| LT |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. #11 ) to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice. If further proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel, the matter will be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon motion of plaintiffs. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 3/4/2022 (mw)
|
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT filed by Alito Tijwan Cross. (ao) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Alito Tijwan Cross.(ao) |
| Filing 10 Supplement by Alito Tijwan Cross to #1 Complaint. (ao) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to United States of America and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Courtesy copies provided to USM for service on US Attorney's Office and US Attorney General's Office) (mw) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT - it is hereby ORDERED that the complaint is DEEMED filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to dismiss USP-Allenwood as a defendant and substitute the United States of America as the sole named defendant in this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE the defendant. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 2/17/2022. (mw)
|
| Receipt of payment from PAMELA D. CROSS in the amount of $402.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE- NON-PRISONER. Transaction posted on 2/16/2022. Receipt number 333080003 processed by gangeli. (jjs) |
| Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 333080003. Complaint is now deemed FILED. (ao) |
| Filing 6 SECOND THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights))(lp) |
| Filing 5 UNCERTIFIED MOTION (Application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alito Tijwan Cross.(ao) Modified on 2/14/2022 (lp). Plaintiff failed to sign Authorization Section |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Continue by Alito Tijwan Cross.(ao) |
| Filing 3 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by Unassigned on 01/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP (civil rights), #2 IFP Short Form (to Pamela Cross))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form) (lp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USP-Allenwood Penitentiary lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Alito Tijwan Cross.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
