Brown v. Harry et al
Petitioner: David M. Brown
Respondent: Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Case Number: 1:2022cv00465
Filed: March 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MP
Referring Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: 1. Browns 5/9/22 letter, #5 , is construed as a mtn for reconsideration, and that mtn is GRANTED;2. The Clerk of Court is directed to REOPEN civil case number 1:22-CV-115, and to docket Browns proposed, all-inclusive Section 2254 petition (Doc. No. 4-1 in case number 1:22-CV-115) as an amended habeas corpus petition lodged on 3/9/22.3. After case number 1:22-CV-115 is reopened and Browns amended Section 2254 petition is docketed, the Court will serve the amended petition and standard show-cause order on the appropriate respondent(s).4. The Clerk of Court shall docket this Order in the instant case and in civil case number 1:22-CV-115.5. This casenumber 1:22-CV-465shall remain closed. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 5/23/22. (ma)
May 20, 2022 Filing 6 Letter from David Brown as Doc. #5 but with cash slip attached; (ep)
May 18, 2022 Filing 5 (LETTER) REQUEST for clarity as to status of case by David M. Brown. (ep)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 5/3/22. (ma)
March 29, 2022 Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 03/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp)
March 29, 2022 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by David M. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1- Opinion and Order regarding Petition for Post-Conviction Relief Act signed by Judge Craig T. Trebilcock of Court of Common Pleas of York County, #2 Attachment 2-Non-Precedential Decision-of Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered 09/26/2019)(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Harry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David M. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Laurel Harry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?