Conners v. County of York
| Rebecca Conners |
| County of York and York County |
| 1:2022cv00563 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Rebecca Conners. County of York waiver sent on 4/19/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. (Karpf, Ari) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia W Clark on behalf of Rebecca Conners (Clark, Julia) |
Filing 3
ORDER re Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 4/19/2022. (mw)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rebecca Conners and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (gs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of York ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5918160), filed by Rebecca Conners. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(gs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
