Villalobos et al v. Ryder System, Inc.
| Nicolas Villalobos and Leidi Quintero |
| Ryder System, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00571 |
| April 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Yvette Kane |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Nicolas Villalobos. Ryder System, Inc. waiver sent on 6/6/2022, answer due 8/5/2022. (Trone, Abbie) |
Filing 3
ORDER re Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 4/27/2022. (mw)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ryder System, Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (rw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ryder System, Inc. ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5920472), filed by Nicolas Villalobos, Leidi Quintero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(rw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
