Jones v. Rivello et al
| Eric Kenneth Jones |
| John Rivello, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office |
| 1:2022cv00825 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, John Rivello, Josh Shapiro by Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, John Rivello, Josh Shapiro. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B)(Lysaght, Ryan) |
| Filing 13 Letter from Plaintiff re: vacating sentence (eo) |
| Filing 12 Letter dated July 4, 2022 from Eric K Jones inquiring as to his mailing being sent to Smart Communications in Florida and the time issues inherent therein, as well as inquiring why he hasn't received his time-stamped petition. (ep) |
| Receipt of payment from ERIC KENNETH JONES in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 6/10/2022. Receipt number 333081469 processed by gangeli. (jjs) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Eric Kenneth Jones. (aaa) |
Filing 10
ORDER - 1. Subject to the petitioner paying the $5.00 filing fee, Respondents, on orbefore July 18, 2022, shall file an initial response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus in the manner required by Rule 5, 28 U.S.C.A. foll. 2254. 2. A determination as to whether there will be a hearing will be madeafter the filing of a response. 3. Petitioner may, if the Petitioner so desires, file a reply to the response within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the response or no later thanAugust 1, 2022.4. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall beserved upon the Dauphin County District Attorney and the Office of Attorney General. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 26, 2022. (kjn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that, on or beforeJune 17, 2022 the petitioner shall complete and file the enclosed election form,indicating an election to have the petition construed and ruled upon under 28U.S.C. 2254 or to withdraw the current petition. In making this election, thepetitioner should carefully consider all of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2244. If the petitioner fails to complete and file the attached election form, the petition willbe ruled upon under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 26, 2022. (kjn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 26, 2022. (kjn)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The petitioner is directed to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 26, 2022. (kjn)
|
| Filing 6 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (lp) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Kenneth Jones.(lp) Modified on 5/25/2022 (lp). |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Eric Kenneth Jones. (lp) Modified on 5/25/2022 (lp). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Kenneth Jones.(lp) Modified on 5/25/2022 (lp). |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in support of petition by Eric Kenneth Jones. (lp) Modified on 5/25/2022 (lp). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Eric Kenneth Jones.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
