Jordan v. Salaman et al
| Robert W. Jordan |
| Bobbi Jo Salaman, PA State Attorney General and Bradford County District Attorney's Office |
| 1:2022cv00952 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| EW |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: 1. Petrs mtn to stay, #10 , is DENIED without prejudice.2. Within (30) days of the date of this order, Petr may renew his mtn to stay and provide the court with the case number and the name of the court in which his appeal is pending.3. Resps first mtn for exttm, #11 , is GRANTED. Resps shall file a response to the petn on or before 10/1/22.4. Resps second mtn for exttm, #12 , is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 7/22/22. (ma)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus with attachments by Bradford County District Attorney's Office. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ondrey, Albert) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus with attachments by Bradford County District Attorney's Office.(Ondrey, Albert) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to file a proposed order for Doc. 11. (pjr) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay by Robert W. Jordan.(dw) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk of Court shall SERVE a copy of the petition and supporting memorandum of law (Docs. 12) and this Order on the Respondents, the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, and the District Attorney of Bradford County. 2. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, Respondents shall ANSWER the petition in the manner required by Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases in the United States Courts. See R. Governing 2254 Cases R. 5(b)-(d) (explaining required contents of answer and supporting materials). See order for further details. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 7/11/2022. (ve)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Robert W. Jordan. (dw) |
| Filing 7 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER with Notice of Limitations on Filing of Future Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 6/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Election)(ve) |
| Receipt of payment from ROBERT W. JORDAN in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 6/24/2022. Receipt number 333081651 processed by gangeli. (jjs) |
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333081651. Petition is now deemed FILED. (dw) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Robert W. Jordan to Clerk re: filing fee payment. (dw) |
| Filing 4 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (ibr) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (ibr) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW filed by Robert W. Jordan re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged No FF and No Motion for IFP Filed). (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (ibr) Modified on 6/16/2022 (lp). Brief scanned in two parts |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Robert W. Jordan.(ibr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
