Daoularis v. Frank et al
| Alexander Daoularis |
| Esq. Lawrence G. Frank Trustee in Bankruptcy for Annagen, LLC t/d/b/a Netrepid Company and Thomas Hogue Owner of assets of Annagen, LLC t/d/b/a Netrepid Company |
| 1:2022cv01212 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Christopher C Conner |
| Susan E Schwab |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Thomas Hogue.(Worley, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10
ORDER re Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 9/27/2022. (mw)
|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Christopher C. Conner for all further proceedings. (jkc) |
|
Filing 9
Order approving re #6 Stipulation, Thomas Hogue answer due 9/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on September 23, 2022. (ibr)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Alexander Daoularis, Thomas Hogue YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 10/24/2022 (ki) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey J. Worley on behalf of Thomas Hogue (Worley, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued,, Extending the time to file an Answer to the Complaint by Thomas Hogue. (Young, Lawrence) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alexander Daoularis. Thomas Hogue served on 8/24/2022, answer due 9/14/2022. (O'Neil, Lindsay) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (eo) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Summons re-issued to Plaintiff's counsel per request. Plaintiff's counsel account is now updated to her current law firm's address and email. (eo) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Alexander Daoularis. Lawrence G. Frank waiver sent on 8/8/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. (O'Neil, Lindsay) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Lawrence G. Frank, Thomas Hogue and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (pjr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lawrence G. Frank, Thomas Hogue ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6020659), filed by Alexander Daoularis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
