Hopkins v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
| Reginald Hopkins |
| U.S. Department of Justice and Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms |
| 1:2022cv01395 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition to Extension of Time filed by Reginald Hopkins. (aaa) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants may file their response to the Complaint on or before December 3, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on October 13, 2022. (kjn)
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, Reginald Hopkins, U.S. Department of Justice YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 11/14/2022 (kjn) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Euliss, Richard) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms served on 9/19/2022, answer due 11/18/2022; U.S. Department of Justice served by USM at U.S. Atty Scranton on 9/19/2022, answer due 11/18/2022. (ep) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed : USM served Summons and Complaint on U.S. Atty General via FedEx on 9/19/22. (ep) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed: USM served Summons and Complaint on ATF PHILA 9/16/22. (ep) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. Department of Justice and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (kjn) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT / Order Granting Application to Proceed IFP; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to theSuperintendent/Warden of the institution wherein Plaintiff is presently confined. The Complaint is DEEMED filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 9, 2022. (kjn)
|
| Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (aaa) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Reginald Hopkins. (aaa) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Reginald Hopkins.(aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Reginald Hopkins.(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
