Martin v. White
Patricia Martin |
Clifton White |
1:2022cv01482 |
September 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Yvette Kane |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Clifton White. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A -Declaration of Clifton White, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B)(English, Joseph) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to file the brief in support of Doc. 7 as a separate entry using the event: Civil Events Motions and Related Filings Responses and Replies (Briefs)- Brief in Support (Do not use for Summary Judgment Motions) (pjr) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Clifton White. (Attachments: #1 Memo Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit(s) A to Brief - Declaration of Clifton White, #3 Exhibit(s) B -to Brief - Landex Publishing Search Page)(English, Joseph) |
Filing 6 Order approving re #5 Stipulation - AND NOW, on this 31st day of October 2022, upon consideration of the parties Joint Stipulation of Extension of Time for Defendant Clifton White to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff Patricia Martin (Plaintiff)s complaint (Doc. No. 5), IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant Clifton White shall have until November 11, 2022, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. No. 1). Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 10/31/22. (dmn) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION of Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond (Joint) by Clifton White. (English, Joseph) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by Patricia Martin. (Tomevi, Justin) |
Filing 3 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 9/27/22. (dmn) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Clifton White and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (pjr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clifton White ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6067452), filed by Patricia Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exh. A, #3 Exh. B, #4 Exh. C, #5 Exh. D)(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martin v. White | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Patricia Martin | |
Represented By: | Justin A. Tomevi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Clifton White | |
Represented By: | Joseph M. English |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.