Mack v. Acting Comissioner of Social Security
| Corrin Lee Mack |
| Acting Comissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv01629 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONSENTS to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge Carlson in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 2022-19. (jkc) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Corrin Lee Mack. Acting Comissioner of Social Security served on 11/4/2022, answer due 1/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt, #2 Certified Mail Receipt SSA)(Jones, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Acting Comissioner of Social Security, Corrin Lee Mack YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 12/7/2022. (kjn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa Swauger on behalf of Acting Comissioner of Social Security. (Swauger, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals (ll) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Acting Comissioner of Social Security and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acting Comissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6088765), filed by Corrin Lee Mack. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mack v. Acting Comissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Corrin Lee Mack | |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Acting Comissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Swauger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
