Jones v. Milsteen et al
Bill Jones |
David Milsteen and John Does |
1:2022cv01654 |
October 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Sylvia H Rambo |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by David Milsteen. (Weed, Murray) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank J. Lavery, Jr on behalf of David Milsteen (Lavery, Frank) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Murray Joseph Weed on behalf of David Milsteen (Weed, Murray) |
Filing 3 ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/21/22. (ma) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John Does, David Milsteen and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (pjr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does, David Milsteen ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6093303), filed by Bill Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.