Salgado v. Spaulding
| David Salgado |
| Stephen Spaulding |
| 1:2022cv01674 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| SM |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Stephen Spaulding by Stephen Spaulding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Index to Exhibits, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Thiel, George) |
| Filing 6 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition Served on U. S. Attorney's Office 11/30/22. (dmn) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - AND NOW, on this 30th day of November 2022, upon consideration of pro se Petitioner David Salgado (Petitioner)s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. No. 1), and the Court observing that Petitioner has paid the requisite filing fee (Doc. No. 4), IT IS ORDERED THAT: Petitioners 2241 petition (Doc. No. #1 ) is DEEMED FILED; The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition (Doc. No. 1) and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney and to note the address of the United States Attorney on the front of the docket sheet in this case. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the United States Attorney. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/30/22. (dmn)
|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333101695. Petition is now deemed FILED. (dw) |
| Receipt of payment from DAVID SALGADO in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 10/31/2022. Receipt number 333101695 processed by AO. (jjs) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 10/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by David Salgado. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Individualized Needs Plan-Program Review, #2 Exhibit B-FSA Recidivism Risk Assessment, #3 Exhibit C-FSA Time Credit Assessment)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Salgado v. Spaulding | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Salgado | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Stephen Spaulding | |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
