Romaine Cleckner v. 3M Company
| Hannah Romaine Cleckner |
| 3M Company |
| 1:2022cv02055 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Hannah Romaine Cleckner. 3M Company waiver sent on 1/27/2023, answer due 3/28/2023. (Anderson, Lexis) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hannah Romaine Cleckner. 3M Company served on 1/4/2023, answer due 1/25/2023. (Anderson, Lexis) |
| Filing 7 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Lexis Anderson, Esq. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/6/2023. (ve) |
| Filing 6 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Robert E. Barnes, Esq. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 1/6/2023. (ve) |
| Filing 5 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson. (ve) |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Lexis Anderson on behalf of Hannah Romaine Cleckner Attorney Lexis Anderson is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-6161747.. (Anderson, Lexis) |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Robert E. Barnes on behalf of Hannah Romaine Cleckner Attorney Robert Barnes is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-6161422.. (Barnes, Robert) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Petitioning attorney and associate counsel's bar status verified. (aaa) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to 3M Company and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6153434), filed by Hannah Romaine Cleckner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A, #3 Exhibit(s) B, #4 Exhibit(s) C, #5 Exhibit(s) D, #6 Exhibit(s) E, #7 Exhibit(s) F)(ll) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Sent an email to Mr. Robert Barnes to apply for pro hac vice or general admission. (ll). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Romaine Cleckner v. 3M Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hannah Romaine Cleckner | |
| Represented By: | Robert E. Barnes |
| Represented By: | Jonathan W. Crisp |
| Represented By: | Lexis Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 3M Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
