Smith, Jr. v. Rokosky
| David W. Smith, Jr. |
| Warden Erik Rokosky |
| 1:2023cv00120 |
| January 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| SM |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Warden Erik Rokosky by Warden Erik Rokosky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Ex_1_and_Attachs_A_B, #2 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Swauger, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition/Memorandum of Law served on U.S. Attorney's Office 3/2/23. (dmn) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Petitioners 2241 petition (Doc. No. 1) is DEEMED FILED; 2. The Court exercises its discretion under Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. 2254, to apply those rules to this 2241 petition; 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition (Doc. No. 1), memorandum of law in support thereof (Doc. Nos. 2, 2-1), and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney and to note the address of the United States Attorney on the front of the docket sheet in this case. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/1/23. (dmn)
|
| Receipt of payment from DAVID W SMITH JR in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 1/23/2023. Receipt number 111100554 processed by SH. (jjs) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in support of Ground One by David W. Smith, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Ground Two, #2 Exhibits List, #3 Exhibit 1-First Step Act of 2018 Text, (14 pages), #4 Exhibit 2-18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1) (1 page), #5 Exhibit 3-U.S.S.G. Section 5G1.2 Sentencing on Multiple Counts of Conviction, (1- Page ) Lexis Nexis Law Dictionary (1 page), #6 Exhibit 4-Judgment in a Criminal Case, (6 pages), #7 Exhibit 5-Sentence Monitoring Computation Data (3 pages), #8 Exhibit 6-Federal Bureau of Prisons, Program Statement, 5880.28, Sentence Computation Manual (6 pages), #9 Exhibit 7-Inmate Education Data Transcript (4 pages))(lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David W. Smith, Jr..(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith, Jr. v. Rokosky | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David W. Smith, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Erik Rokosky | |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
| Represented By: | Melissa Swauger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
