Atwood v. Barraza
Petitioner: Rodger T. Atwood
Respondent: L. Barraza
Case Number: 1:2023cv00155
Filed: January 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: SM
Referring Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2023 Filing 7 SHOW CAUSE ORDER, Petition and memsup Served on US Atty Hbg by personal service (ma)
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. The petn #1 is DEEMED filed;2. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petn, memorandum of law in support thereof #2 , and this Order on Resp and the US Atty;3. Within (20) days of the date of this Order, Resp shall respond to the allegations of the petn;4. Petr shall, if he so desires, file a reply to Resps response within (14) days after its filing; and5. A determination as to whether Petr shall be produced for a hearing will be held in abeyance pending the filing of Resps response. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/21/23. (ma)
February 7, 2023 Receipt of payment from ROGER T ATWOOD in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 2/6/2023. Receipt number 333103083 processed by GR. (jjs)
February 6, 2023 Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333103084. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ao)
January 30, 2023 Filing 4 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 01/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp)
January 30, 2023 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
January 30, 2023 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Rodger T. Atwood. (lp)
January 30, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Rodger T. Atwood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-FSA Time Credit Assessment, #2 Exhibit B-Sentence Monitoring Computation Data, #3 Exhibit C-Copy of Email to Case Management Coordinator from petitioner dated 12/22/2022, #4 Exhibit D-Administrative Remedy Procedure for Inmates Informal Resolution Form, #5 Exhibit E-Copy of Email from Petitioner to Case Management Coordinator dated 1/23/2023, #6 Exhibit F-Request for Administrative Remedy dated 01/24/2023, #7 Exhibit G-Copy of email from Petitioner to Case Management Coordinator dated 01/23/2023, #8 Exhibit H-Copy Court Order signed by the Honorable Christopher C. Conner denying petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus in Criminal Action 1:12-CR-55 and 1:13-CR-260)(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atwood v. Barraza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodger T. Atwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: L. Barraza
Represented By: Joseph J Terz
Represented By: George Michael Thiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?