Newsome v. Nestle Purina Petcare Company
Charles Newsome |
Nestle Purina Petcare Company |
1:2023cv00268 |
February 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Yvette Kane |
Sylvia H Rambo |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nestle Purina Petcare Company.(Wagner, Bethany) |
Filing 4 ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/22/23. (ma) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Charles Newsome. Nestle Purina Petcare Company waiver sent on 2/15/2023, answer due 4/17/2023. (Cummings, Derrek) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case assigned to Judge Rambo. (aaa) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Nestle Purina Petcare Company and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number BPAMDC-6198786), filed by Charles Newsome. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.