Walsh v. Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility
| Francisco Guerrero Walsh |
| Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility |
| 1:2023cv00305 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| SM |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerard Thomas Donahue on behalf of Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility. (Donahue, Gerard) |
| Filing 7 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition Served on U.S. Attorney's Office 4/19/23. (dmn) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - AND NOW, on this 19th day of April 2023, upon consideration of pro se Petitioner Francisco Guerrero Walsh (Petitioner)s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Doc. No. 1), motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 4), and prisoner trust fund account statement (Doc. No. 5), IT IS ORDERED THAT: Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED, and Petitioners petition (Doc. No. 1) is DEEMED FILED; The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition (Doc. No. 1) and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney and to note the address of the United States Attorney on the front of the docket sheet in this case. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/19/23. (dmn)
|
| Filing 5 (CERTIFIED) Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Francisco Guerrero Walsh. (ep) |
| Filing 4 (CERTIFIED) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Francisco Guerrero Walsh.(ep) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus/Motion for Custody Determination Under Diop v. ICE/Homeland Security and for Bond Redetermination Hearing, lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Francisco Guerrero Walsh.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walsh v. Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Francisco Guerrero Walsh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden of Pike County Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
| Represented By: | Gerard Thomas Donahue |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
