Matos-Peguero v. Wertman
Petitioner: Jose Matos-Peguero
Respondent: Warden Wertman
Case Number: 1:2023cv00435
Filed: March 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CA
Referring Judge: Christopher C Conner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2023 Filing 9 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Warden Wertman by Warden Wertman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Loftus, Ryann)
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER - it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. On or before May 17, 2022, respondent shall file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus and a memorandum of law. See R. GOVERNING 2254 CASES R. 1(b), 5(b)-(d) (explaining required contents of answer and supporting materials). Petitioner shall be permitted to file a reply to the answer within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the answer is filed. See R. GOVERNING 2254 CASES R.1(b), 5(e). Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 5/1/2023 (mw)
May 1, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden Wertman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Loftus, Ryann)
April 12, 2023 Filing 6 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition for Habeas Corpus Served on US Attorney. (mw)
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - it is hereby ORDERED that the habeas petition (Doc. 1) is DEEMED filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition (Doc. 1) and this order on respondent. Respondent shall file, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, an answer to the petition (Doc. 1). Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 4/12/2023. (mw)
April 12, 2023 Receipt of payment from JOSE MATOS PEGUERO in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 4/11/2023. Receipt number 333104154 processed by GR. (jjs)
April 11, 2023 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333104154. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ga)
March 13, 2023 Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 03/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp)
March 13, 2023 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
March 13, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Jose Matos-Peguero.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matos-Peguero v. Wertman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Matos-Peguero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Wertman
Represented By: George Michael Thiel
Represented By: Joseph J Terz
Represented By: Ryann D. Loftus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?