Still v. Royalton Recycling et al
| Gary Still |
| Royalton Recycling and JRCJ, INC. |
| 1:2023cv01065 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER - A Telephonic Case Management Conference is set for 9/14/2023 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson. Joint Case Management plan due on or before September 11, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 21, 2023. (kjn)
|
| Filing 12 CONSENTS to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge Carlson in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 2022-19. (jw) |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling. (Stark, Eric) |
| Filing 10 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint of Plaintiff by JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Stark, Eric) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling, Gary Still YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 8/18/2023. (kjn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Winebrake on behalf of Gary Still (Winebrake, Peter) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend Time. Having carefully considered Defendants Unopposed Motion For An Extension Of Time To Respond To Plaintiffs Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED, that the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended until August 16, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 18, 2023. (kjn)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of by JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling re #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint . (Stark, Eric) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling.(Stark, Eric) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Stark to file Certificate of Concurrence/Nonoccurence to document #5 (ll) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary Still. JRCJ, INC. served on 6/29/2023, answer due 7/20/2023. (Gottesfeld, Mark) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary Still. Royalton Recycling served on 6/29/2023, answer due 7/20/2023. (Gottesfeld, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JRCJ, INC., Royalton Recycling ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6324410), filed by Gary Still. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
