Washington v. United States of America
| Ricardo Washington |
| United States of America |
| 1:2023cv01125 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| MP |
| Sylvia H Rambo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Consiglio on behalf of United States of America (Consiglio, Michael) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE by United States of America to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged with Motion for IFP) . (Consiglio, Michael) |
| Filing 7 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petn Served on US Atty office Hbg by personal service (ma) |
Filing 6
ORDER: 1.Petitioners motion #2 for leave to proceed IFP is GRANTED.2.The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petn (Doc. No.1) and this Order on Resp and the US Atty, and to note the address of the US Atty on the front of the docket sheet in this case. 3. Within (30) days of the date of this Order, Resp shall respond to the allegations of the petition. 4. Petr, if desired, may file a reply to Resps pleading within (21) days after its filing. 5. A determination as to whether Petr shall be produced for a hearing will be held in abeyance pending the filing of Resps pleading. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/19/23. (ma)
|
| Filing 5 (CERTIFIED) Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Inmate Accounts obo Ricardo Washington. (ep) |
| Filing 4 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the Warden or other appropriate official of the institution at which Plaintiff is currently incarcerated is directed to provide to the Court, under oath, or declare under penalty of perjury, a statement of the current balance in the Plaintiffs account and a record of the transactions in his account that have occurred with the preceding six (6) months. Signed on 07/06/2023. (ibr) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachment(s): #1 Notice of Consent) (ibr). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ricardo Washington. (ibr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Ricardo Washington. (ibr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Washington v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ricardo Washington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Consiglio |
| Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
