Vision Specialty Chemicals LLC et al v. PPI Tech Inc. et al
Vision Specialty Chemicals LLC and William Buckley |
PPI Tech Inc. and Stephen Moore |
1:2023cv01280 |
August 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Daryl F Bloom |
Martin C Carlson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson no longer assigned to case. (cd) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephen Moore, PPI Tech Inc. ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6358557), filed by Vision Specialty Chemicals LLC, William Buckley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sh) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/2/2023 with updated complaint to include signed verification page per Attorney Manes firm) (nr). Modified on 8/2/2023 (nr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.