Gima v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
| Janet Gima |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 1:2023cv01320 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Daryl F Bloom |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Shelley R. Hebert, Esq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom on October 4, 2023. (kjn) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Janet Gima, The Prudential Insurance Company of America YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 11/3/2023. (kjn) |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Shelley Renee Hebert on behalf of The Prudential Insurance Company of America Attorney Shelley Hebert is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-6420675.. (Hebert, Shelley) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Bar status verified for #4 petitioner and associate counsel. (rw) |
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson no longer assigned to case. (cd) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Janet Gima. The Prudential Insurance Company of America waiver sent on 8/22/2023, answer due 10/23/2023. (Snyder, Marc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6365265), filed by Janet Gima. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gima v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Janet Gima | |
| Represented By: | Marc H Snyder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Jacob FM Oslick |
| Represented By: | Shelley Renee Hebert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
