Bixler v. Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co.
| Michal Bixler |
| Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co. |
| 1:2023cv01361 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Yvette Kane |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN of Plaintiff and Defendant by Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co.. (Staudenmaier, Craig) |
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: A Case Management conference will be conducted by the court on October 26, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. The court prefers to hold this conference by telephone. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate this telephone conference. The telephone number of the court is 717-221-3990. Counsel should be prepared to address any pending motions at the conference. Counsel are advised to comply with Rule 16.3(a) of the Rules of Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Local Rule 16.3 requires lead counsel for each party to meet prior to the case management conference and complete a "Joint Case Management Plan" form. The completed form, which is set forth in Appendix A of the local rules, must be filed jointly by the parties on or before October 19, 2023. See Order for complete details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 9/8/23. (dmn)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co..(Staudenmaier, Craig) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig J. Staudenmaier on behalf of Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co.. (Staudenmaier, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/22/23. (dmn) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6372925), filed by Michal Bixler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bixler v. Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michal Bixler | |
| Represented By: | Samuel J. Rosenthal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Sourthern Railway Co. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua D. Bonn |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Schwartz |
| Represented By: | Craig J. Staudenmaier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
