Francis v. One Stop Mailing, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Jadyn Francis
Defendant: One Stop Mailing, LLC doing business as OSM Worldwide and Staffmark Investment LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv01388
Filed: August 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting the joint mtn to exttm time to respond to the complaint #6 . Dfts' shall respond to the complaint by 11/13/2023. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/12/23. (ma)
October 12, 2023 DOCKET ANNOTATION: For future reference, Counsel for defendants are advised that when filing a motion, the proposed order should be added as an attachment to the motion. (ma)
October 10, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION Second Joint Moton to Enlarge Time to File Responsive Pleading , filed by One Stop Mailing, LLC.(Snethen, Craig)
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting the joint mtn for exttm #4 . Dfts' response/answer to pltf's complaint due by 10/12/2023. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 9/14/23. (ma)
September 12, 2023 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by One Stop Mailing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Snethen, Craig)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 9/7/23. (ma)
August 21, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll)
August 21, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6376698), filed by Jadyn Francis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ll)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Francis v. One Stop Mailing, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jadyn Francis
Represented By: Larry A. Weisberg
Represented By: Derrek William Cummings
Represented By: Michael J Bradley
Represented By: Steve Todd Mahan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Stop Mailing, LLC doing business as OSM Worldwide
Represented By: Craig W. Snethen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Staffmark Investment LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?