Redensky v. Verizon Communications Inc.
| Chantel K. Redensky |
| Verizon Communications Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01579 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Julia K Munley |
| Sylvia H Rambo |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #4 First MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Chantel K. Redensky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Proposed Order)(Howell, Steven) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF IN SUPPORT of Defendant Verizon Pennsylvania LLc's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings re #4 First MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hillsley, Christopher) |
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Julia K Munley for all further proceedings. (jr) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Hillsley, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 First MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order)(Hillsley, Christopher) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Hillsley is to file the only the Brief In Support and Certificate of Service attached to docket entry #4 as a separate docket entry, using the following event; Civil Events Motions and Related Filings Responses and Replies (Briefs) Brief in Support (Do not use for Summary Judgment Motions) (ll) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chantel K. Redensky. Verizon Communications Inc. served on 10/6/2023, answer due 10/27/2023. (Howell, Steven) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Verizon Communications Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6409682), filed by Chantel K. Redensky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits A-1 to B-3, #3 Exhbits C-1 to E-1, #4 Exhbits E-2 to K)(ll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Redensky v. Verizon Communications Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chantel K. Redensky | |
| Represented By: | Steven Howell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Verizon Communications Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher D. Hillsley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
